dvis3yzawwgr9p4du4g7rcqsie1vi7

What’s Wrong With “Correlation?”

Published on

in

It is widely accepted that learning proceeds from basic physical imitation and repetition (rote) to a more cognitive understanding and application as experience increases. We observe this in nature with chimps and as parents with children. This is an accepted framework in the Rote-Understanding-Correlation pyramid found in the Aviation Instructor’s Handbook.

There are two problems with this model as it is currently presented. First, the increasingly common command to “Teach at the correlation level” under-emphasizes the increasingly weak manual skills in most pilots that lead to Loss of Control accidents. We must continually remember to teach each learning level thoroughly and in order – just like the basic skill-building blocks before the complex maneuvers. Every learning experience must start with a rote-level exposure and repetition to the level of habit to establish implicit muscle memory. We cannot teach at the correlation level initially any more than we can build a house starting with the roof.

Secondarily, the word “correlation” does not capture what we really want to achieve at the highest level of pilot performance. Defined as “A basic level of learning where the learner can associate what has been learned, understood, and applied with previous or subsequent learning,” this merely restates the lower learning levels. We need a word that fully captures the final objective of pilot training (and if anyone knows where the term “correlation” originated, I would love to know).

For years, every CFI learned and repeated “correlation” as the holy grail of our educational efforts; it’s become a cultural artifact. The higher levels of learning are build through exposure and experience – as with all learning. As educators, we “help people learn,” by guiding perceptions and building insights. Reflective analysis (critical self-evaluation), creates this highest level and is initially guided and then personally generated. This habit leads to the humility and lifetime learning that creates master pilots. These learners are constantly vigilant and alert for new ideas and skills – and are constantly improving. Every pilot should be taught this skill.

The Aviation Instructor’s Handbook is experimenting with newer terms to replace “correlation” like “higher order thinking skills” (HOTs) derived from the higher levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy:”analysis, synthesis, evaluation.”  However “correlation” still persists in our instructor training materials. Most experienced instructors I discuss this with suggest “metacognition” (thinking about thinking) or “global awareness” as what distinguishes the highest level of learning. Metacognition combines the familiar “situational awareness” with reflective self-awareness. This term totally captures the current situation while projecting consequences into the future. A complete description of metacognition and its value to the educator is found in “How We Learn,” a free book available online and highly recommended for every aviation educator (the *real* FOI). Fly safely out there (and often)!


FREE Webinar with Master WINGS credit.

Join SAFE and get great benefits. You get 1/3 off ForeFlight and your membership supports our mission of increasing aviation safety by promoting excellence in education.  Our FREE SAFE Toolkit App puts required pilot endorsements and experience requirements right on your smartphone and facilitates CFI+DPE teamwork. Our newly reformulated Mentoring Program is open to every CFI (and those working on the rating) Join our new Mentoring FaceBook Group.

10 responses to “What’s Wrong With “Correlation?””

  1. Ivan Korolev Avatar
    Ivan Korolev

    Being a non-native English speaker with background in math and statistics, the word “correlation” definitely sounds weird to me in the learning context. I first learned it in the statistical context (it’s a borrowed word in my native language, only used in math and stats), as a measure of association between two random variables, and other uses of this word still feel foreign to me (even though I’ve been in the US for over 12 years now).

    P.S. I’m currently a student pilot at BGM, not far from you, and I’m close to getting my PPL now. I would like to continue all the way up to CFI.

  2. Dudley Henriques Avatar
    Dudley Henriques

    There is a glaring fact that has to be TOTALLY understood by every flight instructor that I have yet to discover written down in LARGE CAPITAL LETTERS in ANY FAA material distributed for CFI’s. This “fact” separates flight instruction from most other educational pedagogies. It simply accepts the premise that flight instruction takes place in a classroom that is moving dynamically through three dimensional space at high speed and NOT in a static environment as we define a normal classroom.

    Once this basic premise is understood by flight instructors it becomes much easier to accept that much of the instruction that takes place in the aircraft during a dual session should be ROTE and that correlation and meaningful comprehension actually takes place AFTER the duel session between lessons when the student is relaxed and the mind can think placing the pieces of the puzzle together.

    Applied to the KISS principle; Instructors should restrict the theory to the preflight and postflight session and while in flight keep all the explaining at the basic level letting the student fly the airplane executing by rote. By teaching in this manner the student knows it can be done because he/she has done it. The “why” it was done can wait until the student is on the ground and can think about it. It will be there where the student reaches that all important “ah HA” moment.
    Dudley Henriques

  3. Steve Avatar
    Steve

    I think you may be conflating pure skill development with that of cognitive mastery . To be sure skill development requires applied knowledge in order to achieve mastery. Still, at least for me, correlation is a term best applied to higher levels of academic development; headwork if you will. Educational psychology and human performance are two subject areas I’ve spent a considerable amount of time invested in. They interest me because my life’s work and recreation for that matter are deeply affected by both fields of study. Having said that, I’m no formally trained psychologist. I believe the term “practical psychologist” could be applied to a proficient flight/ground instructor. The academic field of psychology seems to be evolving all the time. As soon as we end up memorizing one set of theories we are told, “No, that was all wrong, use THIS instead.” I’m of the opinion that short of an 8 year course and continuing study on the subject the best most us mere humans can do is be thoughtful about what we teach and remaining open to new ideas. Fortunately, during a lifetime of practice I believe we can become “practical” experts in the field in spite of a never ending onslaught of the next best thing. We need to be familiar enough with the current reference documents to introduce them to our subjects so they can pass the checkride but “in practice” I’ve found my own views on much that I consider important in the areas of knowledge, risk management and skill development. IMO these are the things that will keep pilots flying safely “beyond the checkride”.

  4. Dudley Henriques Avatar
    Dudley Henriques

    There is a glaring fact that has to be TOTALLY understood by every flight instructor that I have yet to discover written down in LARGE CAPITAL LETTERS in ANY FAA material distributed for CFI’s. This “fact” separates flight instruction from most other educational pedagogies. It simply accepts the premise that flight instruction takes place in a classroom that is moving dynamically through three dimensional space at high speed and NOT in a static environment as we define a normal classroom.

    Once this basic premise is understood by flight instructors it becomes much easier to accept that much of the instruction that takes place in the aircraft during a dual session should be ROTE and that correlation and meaningful comprehension actually takes place AFTER the duel session between lessons when the student is relaxed and the mind can think placing the pieces of the puzzle together.

    Applied to the KISS principle; Instructors should restrict the theory to the preflight and postflight session and while in flight keep all the explaining at the basic level letting the student fly the airplane executing by rote. By teaching in this manner the student knows it can be done because he/she has done it. The “why” it was done can wait until the student is on the ground and can think about it. It will be there where the student reaches that all important “ah HA” moment.
    Dudley Henriques

  5. Pete Dawson Avatar
    Pete Dawson

    Correlation, cognition and meta are perfect milestones through the learning process. Where I believe the gap exists is understanding true self awareness and how important of a pillar it is for achieving situational awareness. Meta means beyond and correlation begins when learned things are relating together, but seeking a learning style with these results is key.

    – Reaching in the right directions for more correlation of skill and knowledge!

    I think David hits this point well and if you’re working with a student who says, “It sure feels like sluggish performance today and surprises me how a nice warm day like this makes flying a little harder!,” your response should be, “Now you’re correlating the concepts!”

    Would this help reinforce the students ability to learn to that level and will this end up as key pieces of situational awareness during the checkride? Are you, as the instructor, observing the students self awareness or the lack of and do you work with them to adjust for higher learning ability?

    1. David St. George Avatar
      David St. George

      Self awareness is so important to safety. We continually see pilots continue into weather situations that are clearly crazy or trying to “stretch fuel” (I call this “magical thinking”). Maintaining the “meta” view from 35K allows a person to realize “this is crazy” and pursue the alternate plan instead. My objection to “correlation” is mostly the word itself (shouting into the dark night). This word is found nowhere in learning theory (that I know of) and it does not capture the critical “awareness” part at all; strictly logical/cognitive.

      1. Tim Kramer Avatar
        Tim Kramer

        The word I use after rote and application levels of learning is inference. Only about 10% of students get to the level of inference. Inference is taking the rote and application levels of learning and creating new understanding. Developing insights not part of the pedagogy — going beyond the lesson. I think inference is a better word to use instead of correlation which is constrained in the mathematical definition of the word.

  6. Pete Dawson Avatar
    Pete Dawson

    After some digging to understand the term better, I like it even more. Reading about the discovery of statistical correlation and how it has migrated from Francis Galton’s definition to educational analysis provides a deeper understanding.

    Simply, two things are happening absolutely because of each other and not only by association. Statistically a tall parent is going to have a tall child. This heredity is correlated to all other things tall people have as traits. Now, as aviation instructors/eductors, why is this important? Because we teach knowledge and skill. These things are learned differently and stored in different parts of the brain. To know that a student is experiencing a correlation level of learning, we must see knowledges translate to into decisions which require a skill and then see the correct skill applied.

    I’m sure there are better and many more examples; however, if your student is 10nm from the airport at 4500ft AFE do they plan to arrive at PA by an entry leg while achieving proper airspeed? Is this done smoothly? Are checklists completed too?

    This is typically described as being ahead of the airplane, but by definition you are seeing skilled actions directly correlated to the knowledge of the pilot. This would not be correlation if the pilot “feels” high and descends to PA or is instructed to do so. They may have the skill, they may know pattern altitude, but they didn’t see all of the scenario together and react appropriately. I could argue that without correlation of the two, you can’t get to situational awareness.

    I’m not shooting the question in the article down and this was a great question to clear up as the term does feel loosely used in the schoolhouse. This is really great stuff!

  7. Pete Dawson Avatar
    Pete Dawson

    This has been an exciting deep dive. I wonder if I’d have ever obtained this level of knowledge without this article and question.

    As a skeptic, once a question is asked, I see the details being problematic or full of ambiguity. Sometimes this is with intention and other times it’s just in error. David has posed a very valid question so let’s tear down the terms within: “How can you teach to a correlation level?” and “What is the foundation of the term correlation?”

    So we research the term to find Francis Galton’s discovery or invention of statistical correlation. It must meet an incredible standard with proof through theorem or it’s otherwise just by association. Why is this important to answer the original question? I take it one step further to see that these are defined as “levels of learning” not learning styles. You can teach utilizing various styles, but levels are something an evaluator must observe. At my airline, I serve as a Line Check Pilot which switches from educator to evaluator depending upon the event assigned. This is important to understand the levels as something a CFI must observe or evaluate rather than teach. You must shift your teaching styles depending upon which stage you observe the student’s learning level.

    Ok, now we have a foundation, definition and some basis, but how do I apply? As CFI’s we must constantly evaluate our customers to better serve them. If they’re stuck in the understanding level and application is not occurring, we must shift our teaching strategy to get them there and re-evaluate. This rule will apply until you see it all coming “together!” This is when you “feel” like they’re ready for solo, cross country, or checkride. Maybe we should play the tight lip evaluator mode more and judge where they are in the process of the physical skill of flying or the basic understanding of the rules so we can teach them how to align a correlation level of learning. Does you observe your students to recognize where they are in the levels of learning?

    Now, after 20 years, I need to go back and re-read the FOI to see if it intends the same or was in-fact poorly written.

    1. David St. George Avatar
      David St. George

      I have been reading the FOI lately (probably obvious to everyone?) This is an amazingly concise document trying to capture too much information and put it into usable form. Consequently, there is some damage to important concepts of human behavior and learning and also some excluded material that is important to effective education.

      With that said, it is quite a bit better than the old purple “good dog/bad dog” CFI handbook I learned from in the 1980s. It is critical that every serious educator accepts this is only the “minimum viable product” for an educator. It is critical to continue your study and learning (and why I went back to grad school for psychology).

      CFI-PRO™ provides the “missing manual” of CFI techniques designed to “fill the gaps” and provide greater understanding. The “SAFE Toolkit” App provides the “CFI Survival Kit” that will immediately help your teaching effectiveness.

Tell us what *you* think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Thanks for Visiting!

Thank you for visiting the SAFE Blog. There are over 500 specifically tailored articles covering a wide range of aviation issues related to flight training both as a pilot and as a CFI. Search HERE for a specific article, and Join SAFE

Please try our new AI Tool (Chat 5.2 trained on SAFE Blog content) for your specific topics of answers to your aviation questions. SAFE crafted AI Tool


Notification Here!

Stay updated with our latest tips and other news by joining our newsletter.


Free SAFE Toolkit App

Everything a busy CFI needs at their fingertips, *plus* resources for pilot applicants: “Checkride Ready” (with all the DPE advice on how to pass your practical test) FREE Download

Discover more from Aviation Ideas and Discussion!

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading