dvis3yzawwgr9p4du4g7rcqsie1vi7

Surprising Gaps in FAA Requirements

Published on

in

, ,

It is shocking that the FAA instructor, who might be teaching your child or significant other to fly, is only required to have a total of 200 hours and 5 hours alone in a plane. And how comfortable are you learning from an “instrument instructor” when they might never have done what they are teaching  – flown in a cloud (NOT required)?  A “senior instructor,” is able to train a new CFI with only 200 hours teaching and 2 years experience required (and there is great pressure from the industry to soften these requirements). I see both good and bad versions of this system at work every day in flight schools I visit and work with. But safety demands higher personal standards *not* FAA minimums!

It is an understatement to say the FAA certification system has some “shocking minimums.” Even the flight rules allowing “one mile clear of clouds” clearly put true safety directly in the hands of pilots, trusting their judgment and integrity. Safety also requires professional organizations like SAFE to define, inspire, and build higher professional standards for pilots and educators.  Look at the significant change – ACS – our Pilot Reform Symposium fostered in the FAA training and testing system. We are YOUR organization, and appreciate YOUR support. SAFE achieved 3000 members last month and also the WINGS survey results placing us #1 as your “trusted knowledge provider” (our humble gratitude for such success!) But the votes of support are just the launching pad for much greater programs soon to come.

Both CFI-PRO™ and Checkride Ready! are very new programs that will grow into significant educational platforms as gatherings are again permitted and our industry picks up full speed after COVID. You can help by spreading our SAFE brand to flying friends in your area (that 1/3 off ForeFlight is an attractive incentive) please spread the word. Wear our SAFE branded apparel and share these posts. Get in touch to become a regional SAFE Ambassador. If you are already a member, Step-Up to a supporting level or provide a tax-deductible gift this “giving season” (SAFE is an educational not-for-profit 501-C-3). We also need volunteers for programs and committees as we grow. Stay SAFE and fly often, thanks for your help in growing SAFE.


Our FREE SAFE Toolkit App  has all 61.65 endorsements, experience requirements and the new ACS codes right on your smartphone. Join SAFE and receive other great benefits (1/3 off ForeFlight!) Flying Mag, GA News.

Our new “Checkride Ready!™”is now on the SAFE toolkit app (prepared by senior DPEs). This guidance helps prevent “Pink Slips” during flight tests by fully preparing every applicant for their checkride. Both Private and Instrument are now complete.

9 responses to “Surprising Gaps in FAA Requirements”

  1. Mark King Avatar
    Mark King

    David, while I agree with your comments about CFI professionalism, as a SAFE member I cannot support your comments regarding the recently disgraced DPE, Michael Puehler. While it is obvious that this DPE has run afoul of the FAA, I cannot find any FACTS as to exactly what the malfeasance was, therefore how can you judge him in a public forum without the facts? You use the word “larceny”, and I must ask if that is the case, or is that conjecture on your part? If you have the facts, please share. The point here was this due to his administrative actions as a DPE, or his personal conduct or what? Additionally, taking a OFFICIAL FAA document and modifying it with the SAFE logo is not something I am able to support as a member.

    I do not know Mr. Puehler at all, and do feel he should be accountable, however without the facts, how and what do we learn from this?

    Thanks.

    1. David St. George Avatar
      David St. George

      Since administrative law does not follow the usual rules of evidence and procedure found in civil law we cannot access the accusations or evidence, only the outcome (unfortunately). When internal cases involve this many years and different roles, the reasonable assumption is that this was not an administrative error, but a major malfeasance. Additionally, when someone inside the FAA is found culpable, that person has already exhausted many internal avenues of appeal. It might be possible to get more detailed information with a FOI request? When we store articles in our library on our server they are “stamped” with the logo (docs provided to the public, once downloaded are not official FAA).

  2. […] time under their belt and may never have even fueled an airplane. (Other blogs have enumerated the horrors of FAA minimum training.) New CFIs (in the US) have no required mentoring or supervision when they start teaching. They are […]

  3. […] time under their belt and may never have even fueled an airplane. (Other blogs have enumerated the horrors of FAA minimum training.) New CFIs (in the US) have no required mentoring or supervision when they start teaching. They are […]

  4. […] have to do is fly all the maneuvers that you already practiced and prove to the examiner you meet the minimum FAA standards (more on this in a moment). You do not have to “climb the ladder” in a flight test […]

  5. […] have to do is fly all the maneuvers that you already practiced and prove to the examiner you meet the minimum FAA standards (more on this in a moment). So you do not have to “climb the ladder” in a flight test […]

  6. […] have to do is fly all the maneuvers that you already practiced and prove to the examiner you meet the minimum FAA standards (more on this in a moment). So you do not have to “climb the ladder” in a flight test […]

  7. […] Every private should have 10 crosswind landings (logged) and should demonstrate solid proficiency – because your DPE will never see this on “test day”.  All instrument students should have 3-5 hours of actual weather flying experience (ditto). And the fact that CFIIs teach pilots instrument skills and have never themselves been in a cloud is unconscionable. Most learners quickly understand that real clouds are actually easier to fly through – what a confidence builder (and necessary step).  Every private pilot encountering marginal VFR suddenly gains respect for how minimal “FAA minimums” can be. […]

  8. […] Every private should have 10 crosswind landings (logged) and should demonstrate solid proficiency – because your DPE will never see this on “test day”.  All instrument students should have 3-5 hours of actual weather flying experience (ditto). And the fact that CFIIs teach pilots instrument skills and have never themselves been in a cloud is unconscionable. Most learners quickly understand that real clouds are actually easier to fly through – what a confidence builder (and necessary step).  Every VFR pilot encountering marginal VFR suddenly gains respect for how minimal “FAA minimums” can be. […]

Tell us what *you* think!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Thanks for Visiting!

Thank you for visiting the SAFE Blog. There are over 500 specifically tailored articles covering a wide range of aviation issues related to flight training both as a pilot and as a CFI. Search HERE for a specific article, and Join SAFE

Please try our new AI Tool (Chat 5.2 trained on SAFE Blog content) for your specific topics of answers to your aviation questions. SAFE crafted AI Tool


Notification Here!

Stay updated with our latest tips and other news by joining our newsletter.


Free SAFE Toolkit App

Everything a busy CFI needs at their fingertips, *plus* resources for pilot applicants: “Checkride Ready” (with all the DPE advice on how to pass your practical test) FREE Download

Discover more from Aviation Ideas and Discussion!

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading